Conditions may be too severe for South Africa.
.....For many debt-ridden African countries, receiving IMF
assistance has meant subjecting their economies to a brutal form of
shock therapy prescribed by the IMF as a condition for receiving
financial assistance." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 2 - 'Auckland Star', 2nd February 1990 - "Telecom sale
only weeks away.
This year we intend to complete our privatisation programme",
Mr C....l said, but his office later circulated another version of the
speech in which the word complete had been changed to continue...."
End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 3 - We then flew across to Great Britain and picked up a
copy of the 'Daily Telegraph', 12 March 1990 - "Telecom seeks
sell-off for expansion overseas.
British Telecom is pressing the government to sell its remaining 49% state holding before the next general election.
....The Labour Party has listed British Telecom as its main privatisation target...." End quote. (Emphasis added)
Link that information with this information - 'Australian', 25 May 1992 - "Selling off government businesses to the private sector once would have raised fury in large sections of the community. These days it is regarded as inevitable.
Even selling off government services such as prisons and roads seems to have gained wide-spread acceptance although there are still some pockets of resistance.
Most people acknowledge that governments simply do not have the discipline nor the expertise to run business operations efficiently.
....the British Government's privatisation programme started in the early 1980's.
In the U.K. more than 200 government businesses have been
sold off..." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 4 - 'Daily Nation', Nairobi, Kenya, 14th July 1993 - "No
new U.K. aid to Kenya. Minister: IMF conditions must be met."
End quote.
Proof 5 - 'The Age', Melbourne, 28th April 1993 - "Africa faces
ruin says report.
...Oxfam suggests that unless IMF's terms and conditions are fundamentally altered, it would be better to extricate the IMF from Africa altogether...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Would you like something a little more up to date?
During a recent trip to Ghana, the local people were very upset by
the introduction of VAT. The same problem arose in early 1995 in
Western Samoa, where there was an attempt to unseat the government
of the day.
In Ghana, West Africa, I was able to assure both government and people that conflict was useless as the conditions have been in place for many years i.e. Value Added Tax (VAT) or a Goods and Services Tax (GST).
A politician in Australia, in the year 1994, whilst battling to become Prime Minister, foolishly told the electorate, "When I get into power I am going to introduce GST." This is very similar to saying - "Vote for me and I'll shoot you in the head."
Rule - You must never announce a new tax until you first secure the job. The poor man was doing so well too, and even to this day probably wonders what went wrong.
Now, let us return to the Ghanaian illustration.
Proof 6 - Stage 1 - 'The Independent', Ghana, 12-18 April 1995
We can't avoid VAT - Dr B....y.
The Minister for Finance and Economic Planning, Dr B....y has called on Ghanaians to endure the effects of the Value Added Tax (VAT) and that "No matter how difficult it is a current (sic) and we must join."
He said the industrialised nations including African countries such as South Africa, Nigeria, and Malawi, are all practising VAT.
"....If we stop collecting VAT, and then go to the IMF to collect money, they will not take us serious (sic) because we were unable to implement the policy", Dr B....y added." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Thank you Dr. In all my years, I have not ever heard of a politician
who laid it straight on the line as this man did.
Understanding an issue brings a measure of trust and credibility. But no, the others bumble on, deceiving and being deceived.
Stage 2 - In the 'Daily Nation' newspaper, 15th July 1995, we read, "Ghanaian President..... urged his finance minister who has steered the country through years of economic reform, not to resign while the country was trying to entice in foreign investment... Minister B....y had tendered his resignation a week ago...." End quote.
Stage 3 - 'Zambia Times', 23rd July 1995, "Ghana's President accepted the resignation of Finance Minister B....y.....
The 50 year old lawyer has received praise for championing the economic reforms which halted the slide in the economy and built the foundation for a take-off. But he has also been bitterly criticised by others who blame the reforms sponsored by the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, for difficulties, especially the high cost of living and unemployment.
B...y has not stated publicly why he is leaving but he did say that he had thought about it long and hard." End quote.
No person with understanding should ever criticise any politician wishing to leave their job. The pressures are, in many cases, insufferable.
So then, who is the big bad wolf? Is it the IMF, the World Bank, the Bank for International Settlements or G7?
No - let's go back to the beginning.
Do you sincerely believe that a little known New Zealand politician who had his own business collapse, could possibly dream up such a clever scheme? It was alive before this man was born. Credit only where credit is due.
An interesting excerpt from a U.S. paper called EIR, 23rd September 1988. ".... The overall approach was laid out by IMF Director General..... in a recent interview to a German newspaper.
"If a country thinks the IMF is a big satan or a criminal organisation, we can't do anything for such a country. Naturally, we only work with those countries that want to work with us."
....That kind of approach doesn't leave anybody any choice.
Work with the IMF and get wiped out by its conditionalities policies, don't work with the IMF and get destroyed." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
That's an interesting choice isn't it? Your country will be wiped out, or destroyed.
This is not in any way a criticism of the IMF as they are also locked inextricably into the plan. They do what they are told.
Heavy stuff eh?
Do you somehow feel at this point that the information is becoming irrefutable?
No? Then read on!
Some of you may feel that yours is the only country in the world that is privatising and thus has these problems. We have established quite clearly, I feel, that privatisation is simply one of the conditions.
Enter the RothschiIds family - the House of the Red Shield.
At this time of writing (27th April 1995), they are going through some fairly deep waters regarding their involvement in the privatisation and subsequent selling out of British Coal to a group who were not the highest bidders - This type of behaviour is not limited to Great Britain.
Did you know that the Rothschilds have a privatisation unit?
Proof 7 - 'Weekend Australian', 2-3 January 1988 - "Rothschild
and Sons drops its guard.
....Mr O.....r L.......n and Mr J.....n W.....e, members of the Rothschilds International Privatisation unit.
....Mr L....n had been a member of the Prime Minister's policy unit.
....Since arriving at Rothschilds, they have worked on a slew of privatising projects.
Mr L....n has written a book.... called 'Privatising the World' ."
End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 8 - 'Daily Mail', 13th April 1990 - "The great sell-off.
Russia paved the way yesterday for massive privatisation that will
send shockwaves through the Soviet economy.
President Gorbachev's economic advisers announced that 70 per
cent of the state sector would be privatised." End quote.
And who do you think travelled to Russia to teach them to
privatise? None other than the ex-New Zealand Minister of Finance.
Proof 9 - 'Herald', 20 February 1992 - "The former Minister of
Finance, Sir R....r D........s, is off soon to talk to the Russians about
privatisation..... Sir R.....r said he would be part of a three man
privatisation advisory committee organised by the WORLD BANK...."
End quote. (Emphasis added.)
What further information do we learn from this article? There
were two others involved, suggesting clearly that this is not one
man's plan. Others are in on the deal as front men in different areas
of the world. Try and deny this part if you will, but we know who the
rotten apple in the barrel is!
Proof 10 - 'Citizen', Johannesburg, South Africa, 7 August
1993 - "Zambia to step up privatisation.
Deputy Director of the Zambia Privatisation Agency.......Zambia, whose economies....ravaged by 27 years of misdirection and mismanagement under State control, plans to privatise more than 150 companies over five to ten years.
.....He said ....redundancies would be minimal...."
(Author's note - "Ha, ha, ho, ho..." )
"....He said.....its privatisation legislation placed no restriction
on who could invest in Zambia, or the number of companies which
could be bought...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 11 - During the early 1990's, we stopped off at the Island of
Mauritius on our way to South Africa. We came across a
demonstration being held, where workers, fearful of losing their jobs,
violently waved placards and screamed out unmentionable things in
the French language. One banner was very clear with only four words
on it. Although French is not my natural language, I did indeed take
some pride in translating this to my wife - "Non a la privatisation!"
Proof 12 - 'Citizen', Johannesburg, South Africa, - "Madagascar
privatises.
Madagascar is to sell off its state controlled companies as part
of reforms agreed with the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 13 - 'Financial Times', London, 10 April 1991 - "IMF
Egypt in $350m accord." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 14 - 'Financial Times', London, 11 January 1991 - "Israel
may turn to IMF...
the country is likely to have to borrow $20 billion over the next
several years." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 15 - 'Financial Times', London, 15 January 1991 -"Strong
demand for shares in Polish privatisation." End quote. (Emphasis
added.)
Proof 16 - 'Financial Times', London, 4 January 1991 - "Brazil
privatisation countdown begins." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 17 - 'Financial Times', London, 25 January 1991 - "Prague
begins property privatisation." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 18 - 'Financial Times', London, 1991 - "Czechs hang "for
sale" sign on 50 of republic's key companies."
End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 19 - 'Financial Times', London, 13th June 1991 -
"Argentina's talks with IMF reach a critical stage...." End quote.
(Emphasis added.)
"What else is there to be privatised?" I hear you cry. Oh, not very
much really - just the hospitals, jails, town water, railways, trains,
airlines, freeways, bridges, electricity, airports, government
banks, government shipping lines, gas companies, serum
laboratories, scientific laboratories, inland fishing rights, ocean
fishing rights, defence facilities, etc etc etc....
Proof 20 - 'Edmonton Journal', 15 May 1994 - "Jails on the
road to privatisatlon." End quote.
Proof 21 - In an advertisement in a magazine called 'Airline
Business', a conference was to be held in London 28-29 March 1988.
The title of the conference was "Toward the Global Airline".
Whilst speaking in Johannesburg, South Africa, in the year 1992, on August 13th, a staff member from South African Airways heard what I had said, went back to work later that evening, and punched the keys on the computer under 'General Information'.
He was astounded at what he had read and came back the next night to tell me. "Only 6 major airlines will remain."
This will explain why we regularly read the words 'merge, merge, merge'.
This book is not written with the express aim of frightening anybody, but it is important to bring this section to a close with a damning piece of evidence to show that we are indeed on the right track.
When I revealed this information to about 2,500 people in Ghana, West Africa, during the month of April, an audible gasp went through the audience.
South Africa and Nelson Mandela are so well-known worldwide,
that this information will now clarify the issue to hand.
Rule - Obey the conditions or you don't get the money.
Before being elected President, Nelson Mandela allayed the fears
of his voters in the ANC party and said that he would in no way
yield to the money lenders and privatise, thus ultimately selling out
the country's independence and sovereignty. Now, please take note.
Proof 22 - 'Business Day', 11 July 1994 - "G7 leaders pledge
financial aid for South Africa.
....European officials said South Africa was likely to obtain aid from a number of countries, but cited no numbers. They stressed that "the G7 countries" (author's comment - please note this phrase), had actively backed the resumption of financial support for South Africa by the IMF and the World Bank...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Note here the clear link between G7, the IMF and the World Bank.
Put on your safety belt.
Proof 23 - 'Weekend Australian', 5-6 November 1994 - "ANC to
privatise in shock reversal.
The African National Congress has been forced into several policy reversals since becoming the leading partner in South Africa's government of national unity, but few of its conversions have been more dramatic than its recent decision to embrace privatisation to generate funds for social development.
Only a month after the country's April election, President Mandela was vowing he would never support a programme that would merely channel more wealth into the hands of the country's white minority. As recently as August, Mr J....y N.....o, minister in charge of implementing the Government's centrepiece reconstruction and development programme, condemned privatisation as a method of "sacrificing long term assets, for a short term benefit...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Good man - clear thinking!
Illustration - I have a very close friend who owns a saw-milling business. Wishing to visit his home country, he enquired as to whether or not, in my opinion, he should sell his saw mill to raise enough money for the airfare. I said "Don't do it. You collect your air fare money, of that there is no doubt, but when you return back again, you no longer have your asset to use for generating further finance.
To those of you persistent enough to continue on this far in the reading of this book, I herewith state the obvious -
Old (you know who) here is so smart that he can see what politicians and others cannot see. By selling up the family silver, it is goodbye to sovereignty and goodbye to independence as the governments of these countries will have nothing left with which to work with or generate finance.
Hey - We are in dire trouble!
Believe it or not, in the little country of New Zealand in the year 1995, some of the leaders in this diabolical plot, along with their cohorts, are trying to set up a political party to finish the job; some may even say "To finish us off!"
We suspect that they will still do well in the polls as apparently only elephants have good memories.
A good analogy in this case could be 'the battered wife syndrome' - 'Hit me again, I needed that'.
A further note from the role model country of New Zealand. We originally had two major political parties who took turns at the helm of our country's politics.
Today, on 27th April 1995, the leadership of the country is further weakened by setting up a mass of little parties, none of them with any 'clout' (power). Remember the old phrase - "United we stand, divided we fall."
The new system is called M.M.P. (Mixed Member Proportional). I asked a friend the meaning of these three letters to which he replied "Many Mixed-up Politicians".
We need help, and we need it urgently.
Your country will follow the New Zealand plan. As they have also borrowed money, they must also fulfil the conditions.
Gradually, circumstances will be developed, so that political power
moves from each nation to the international New World Order ruling
elite.