At the end of 1990, George Bush in his Gulf War speech, spoke of a 'mystical 1000 Points of Light'. He did not explain this any further.
To cleverly, unobtrusively, surreptitiously, using Fabian Socialism
practices, relieve each country of
a) first of all its national assets
b) its governmental ability to govern
c) its sovereignty and independence
d) and link each country into an INTERDEPENDENT
GLOBAL VILLAGE whilst the citizens are still asking the
question "What's happening?"
a) Do not on any account advise the citizens of the electorate what you are about to do or are doing.
b) Select key government departments and announce that these are about to be corporatised, privatised, then later on of course, these can be sold up to new overseas owners.
During the month of May, 1995, I heard a lady being interviewed on the radio who said: - "I've often longed to know the future so that I can live in the light of that knowledge."
Never fear Madam, we are here to help you.
THE STOOGES - There are at least 1000 groups with the gnostic, illuminated, secret, knowledge.
These are Mr Bush's "1,000 Points of Light".
Many of these persons involved must be connected with societies such as the Freemasons, who in many cases, yet not all, give more allegiance to their own obligations than to the laws of the country. Sad, yet true. (Read 'The Brotherhood' by Stephen Knight.) It has been suggested that almost all men given a knighthood thus enabling them to be called "Sir", are Freemasons. Should any reader of this book be able to prove that this is incorrect, please contact the author.
It is of significance that one of the first to speak of a "global concept" was Dr Henry Kissinger. He is now involved in world restructuring. Could this be the reason why he recently received a knighthood from the Queen?
Wairarapa 'Times Age', 14th June 1995 - "Honorary Knight.
Henry Kissinger, the veteran statesman, and former United States
Secretary of State, is to be awarded an honorary knighthood.... The
award is to be presented to Mr Kissinger by the Queen in London
on June 20th.
As an American, he will not be allowed to call himself "Sir", an
honour reserved for British citizens.
The detailed reasons for the award were not given." End quote.
(Emphasis added).
It is also of note that on occasions, various writers have referred
to this man as a public relations advocate for the New World Order.
The ancient prophecies make it exceptionally clear that this New World Order will continue on for only three and a half years once it comes to full power, under the complete control of a powerful leader.
Are these proponents of the New World Order evil?
Not all. Mostly very sincere but ignorant of the end results of their enterprise.
1In the guinea pig country of New Zealand, 40 politicians belong to a group called P.G.A. - 'Parliamentarians for Global Action'. Without reading books like this, the majority of these people would not have a clue as to the aims of the little-known group.
(All who belong to this society should now seek out their own literature, outlining aims and objects of P.G.A. Then, upon becoming suitably shocked at what they read, resign immediately.)
1 The list of names was broadcast on a Sunday evening, over a
New Zealand radio station on February 19th, 1995.
The scene was San Diego International Airport on February 18th, 1991.
I boarded a flight which would take me through to Dallas, Fort Worth, then on to Midland and finally to a small town called 'Big Spring', Texas. An invitation had been issued to conduct a series of lectures.
Whilst dashing through the airport, I just had time to pick up a copy of the Los Angeles 'Times'.
Prior to this date, we had watched the television screen with great interest as George Bush had introduced the words 'New World Order' to us on a number of occasions whilst also discussing Saddam Hussein's attack on Kuwait.
Over and over, the same words 'New World Order, New World Order'...what did it mean?
By this time I was also aware of President Bush's involvement
with a secret fraternity called the 'Skull and Bones', during his
days at Yale University. Entrance to this society was highly selective
and only two authors seemed to know anything about it.
a. Ron Rosenbaum
b. Antony C. Sutton
The initiations to this German-based society were reported to be:
a. wrestling, while completely unclothed, in a bath of mud;
b. lying in a coffin revealing the personal secrets of your life to the
other members of the club;
c. being locked in a tomb for a season, wailing like a banshee;
By the way, it should be noted at this point that the motto of Yale
University * (see note below) is the same as that which is written on the base of the
pyramid found on the reverse side of the US$1 bill - 'Novus Ordo
Seclorum' i.e. a secular, heathenistic, ungodly, New World Order.
When the members graduate from Yale, they then move on to
another highly secret group called 'The Order'.
* Web publisher's note:- this information appears to be false, as the motto of Yale University is "Lux et Veritas"
1Antony Sutton, in his brilliant expose, tells how The Order manipulates politics, education, religion, and economy, towards one end i.e. a complete takeover of every person's individual freedoms.
Being of German origins, the philosophies of two great thinkers
were strictly adhered to:
a. Kant
b. Hegel
Quoting from Antony Sutton's book, we read -"From this system of Hegelian philosophy comes the historical dialectic i.e. that all historical events emerge from a 'conflict' between opposing forces...." End quote.
In other words, there is no chance of setting up such a monumental change in society without a "very significant war".
Now, enter one Saddam Hussein. A man who no doubt, morning by morning, views himself in his bedroom mirror, smiles at himself and says "Here I come, you lucky people."
The world planners saw to it that this man received wrong advice from the two super-powers, prior to his invasion of Kuwait.
Russia - General Makashov "Yes, go on Saddam. You will become the hero of the OPEC nations. They all despise Kuwait as being the fat cat of the Middle East. The Kuwaitis continue to set their own oil prices in defiance of all the others in the area. Yes, go for it, my boy" (or words to that effect).
Saddam smiles. His only worry now is "What will the U.S. reaction be? Will they intervene and spoil my plans?"
A meeting is arranged between Saddam and the representative from the United States of America - one April Glaspie, who also appeared to give him the 'okay'; whether intentionally or not, we cannot say.
Whilst in the States a little after this event, we watched television coverage of April Glaspie being interviewed by the Congress.
Congress: "What advice did you offer to Saddam Hussein, Ms Glaspie?"
Ms Glaspie: "Arab problem - Arab solution".
Obviously Saddam took this as an 'okay', thumbs up style message. He invaded Kuwait and was immediately attacked by the combined armies of the Novus Ordo Seclorum (New World Order).
In fact, George Bush made this fact abundantly clear, that for the first time in history, a common aggressor had been dealt with by the armies of the major nations of the world.
This was to serve as a lesson to any other nation that may feel inclined to get 'stroppy' and out of hand. "What we gave Saddam, we are also capable of giving to you."
This is a perfect example of the Hegelian Dialectic in operation!
It is for this reason, the U.S.A. began the trend in closing down military bases left, right, and centre. Under the New World Order, or the 'Global Village', we will no longer need to fight one another, as our hearts are all going to change and be full of love, one for the other. Any miscreants will be dealt with swiftly and harshly by the international armies of the New World Order.
Notice for example how 'decisively' and 'swiftly' the United Nations' forces dealt with the problems in Somalia and then in Bosnia. (Tongue in cheek, of course.)
If this is how the United Nations' Army operates, heaven help us!
Oh yes. We will ultimately all join hands with Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, and each other, moving our bodies rhythmically and singing "We are the world".
Meanwhile, back to the L.A. Times article - 18th Feb 1991
Flying over Texas at about 30,000 ft, I lazily turned to the inside pages of the newspaper and figuratively speaking, almost fell out of my seat. The first thing that struck my eye was a demonstrator's picture with the words, "Welcome to the New World Order", with a border of human skulls all the way around the outside. The amazing article which was written below the picture read in part:
"Policy - The President found a slogan for his Administration. But neither he nor anyone else can seem to define it." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
In other words, the message is so heavily coded, people do not understand it.
("Excuse me - that is the main reason for this book".)
Continue quote - "Go and ask them upstairs", urged a senior State Department official, whose job, at least on paper, includes building large parts of the New World Order.
"I can tell you what I think it is ", another senior official confessed, "but I'm not sure that it is the same as what the President thinks it is...." End quote.
On the 31st March 1991, we were in Seattle and picked up a copy of the Hearst paper, 'P.I. Focus'. There was a very revealing cartoon showing George Bush as the policeman of the world. A map of the world done as a comic strip showed up the New World Order as a type of comedy.
A psychologist in New Mexico once told me that if you wish to
put over a very terrifying message in an acceptable manner, they
would recommend the use of:
a) music and song
b) humour
For example, in this comic strip we see each country portrayed in
a light-hearted manner.
Los Angeles = Crips and Bloods (gangs)
N.W. South America = Drug Lords
N.E. South America = Rain Forest - to be paved
Central and South America = Debt
Central Africa = Malnutrition
South Africa = Mandela Land (later proven to be correct)
Russia = Gorbyland (later proven to be incorrect)
Australia = Shrimp barbeque
Then surprise, surprise, in the month of June I was handed a copy of the Robert Maxwell newspaper - 'The European', 14-16 June 1991, with the heading "Old New World Order". Reader please listen to me. The things which I have been saying for years are, in part, now in the public domain.
Quote in part - "Yale's founding slogan is Novus Ordo Seclorum (New World Order). Could it really be that simple? The President is known to be a keen Yalie, full of school-spirit. He endures a good deal of teasing about his membership of 'Skull and Bones', the most arcane and exclusive of the college's many 'men-only' dining clubs.... Of course one notices the obvious, one finds it assailing the sense at every turn. Novus Ordo Seclorum is also inscribed on the Great Seal of the United States. In that exalted capacity, it appears on the reverse side of every dollar bill....
....Mikhail Gorbachev made a speech at the United Nations December 7 1988, weeks after the election of George Bush to leadership of the free world.
"Today, the further world progress is only possible through a search for a universal human concensus as we move forward to a New World Order."
....Did Thomas Jefferson, as a U.S. founding father, beat Bush and Gorbachev to the phrase?...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Please take note that the author of this article, one Christopher Hutchins, asks this final question at the conclusion of the article. I suspect he knows the answer.
1 An introduction to the Order by Antony Sutton; State Publishing Co., Montana, U.S.A.
Your country will also experience ethnic unrest as tensions are stirred up by factions who themselves are secretly primed by New World Order agents, following the plans of the Hegelian dialectic.
Remember - Thesis versus Antithesis.
At a suitable time in history, repressive laws are introduced, thus controlling both groups.
Hegel called this - Synthesis.
If you were a planner, looking for a country to test out your diabolical
plan, which one would you choose?
a) A little known place, as far away as possible so as to be
inconspicuous.
b) A country whose activities are considered so unimportant that
the world's media barely give it a thought.
c) A country situated as close to the international dateline as possible
so that the day's trading for the world could start there each
morning.
d) A country with possibly a fair sized land mass (shall we say about
the size of Great Britain) but with a tiny population.
e) A population of people who are not in the main vocal,
demonstrative, or vociferous in their condemnation or opposition
of anything they find offensive. Their national motto could be
summed up in the words, "She'll be right".
f) A population who, in the main, know very little of activity in the
outside world, only that which is carefully fed to them by the
media.
g) Preferably an island nation where border controls do not pose a
great problem.
h) A country looked upon as a poorer brother to a larger nation
nearby. The plan could therefore be tested on both nations in
tandem. The larger nation situated alongside this test case country,
could have as their motto, "She'll be right, mate."
Can you visualise such a nation?
I can because I was born there. I am saddened to tell you, it is my
birth place - New Zealand.
Using the American programme, "That's Incredible" as an example of
the average N.Z.er's laid back and slack attitude to life, our programmers
designed their own show entitled, "That's Fairly Interesting".
Proof 1 - see page 135 of our book 'Final Notice'. Quote - "In the late 1980's, the President of the World Bank visited New Zealand. "New Zealand's economic restructuring was a role model for other countries which also had to adjust their policies to achieve growth", the World Bank president, Mr Barber Conable said...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 2 - The "Australian" newspaper, 25th August 1995, makes this point very clear with the giant heading -
"The Kiwi Experiment - New Zealand's robust approach to micro-economic reform has been held up as a model for the country. But research has cast doubt on whether the gain has been worth the pain. Detailed analysis undertaken by a New Zealand economist has concluded the country's growth performance has been the worst of any industrialised country.... since the country's economic reforms were begun in 1984." End quote. (Emphasis added.)
Proof 3 - "The New Zealand Experiment. Harsh ABC's of Frugality. 'Edmonton Journal', 14th November 1995:
"The public seems largely resigned to the irreversible nature of the reforms. But there is still bitterness and distrust of Government..." End quote.
Alberta, of course, is following the New Zealand Rogernomics plan.
Now, it is quite simple for you, the reader, to understand all this information written in extremely simple English. However, it took over 24 years to put it all together. I can assure you that this is not conjecture. It is all fact.
Come with me on this fascinating journey as we search to find out why our country has been so drastically torn apart. Readers from other countries, take out your pen and make notes, as many of you by now have followed this same path, or at this very time are following it to the letter.
Other countries' citizens will sometimes claim that their country in particular was also a test case. This could well be true on occasions as the new World Order folk do not put all their eggs into one basket. This would make the 'plan' too obvious too quickly, and angry citizens may attempt to put a stop to it.
For example, although the initial plan commenced in New Zealand in 1984, we need to point out the following facts.
Australia - 1984: Henry Kissinger flew into this country and gave talks to financial institutions and politicians. Just after he left, EFTPOS (Electronic Funds Transfers at the Point of Sale) commenced.
Singapore - harsh penalties for littering, smoking, chewing gum, etc, are now in place. This could soon go world-wide.
With the Australian elections over, Mr John Howard and his government are now free to follow the New Zealand plan - closing down hospitals and post offices, getting rid of Unions and the ACTU, and replacing them with Individual Personal Contracts. Not only that, the Welfare System must go and folk will be encouraged to take out Private Insurance cover.
In Great Britain, Mr Tony Blair is being groomed to follow the same path. Goodbye Mr Major.